Re: Request to backport CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK to 6.12 stable
On 07/17/2025, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-07-16 at 13:25 -0700, William McVicker wrote:
> > On 07/16/2025, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 09:39:28AM -0700, William McVicker wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Recently utilization clamping was enabled in the 6.15 experimental kernel via
> > > > the options UCLAMP_TASK and UCLAMP_TASK_GROUP [1] per the request in [2]. I'd
> > > > like to request for this change to backported to the ARM64 6.12 stable kernel
> > > > to allow us to use this feature with a stable kernel for better performance
> > > > management of VMs on arm64 servers.
> > > >
> > > > Please let me know if there are any concerns or additional steps I need to
> > > > take.
> > >
> > > This is a new feature, and at this point of the release preparation
> > > for trixie it won't be accepted anymore as it is not adding hardware
> > > support.
> > >
> > > That means you likely will need to use later a bpo version for trixie.
> >
> > Thanks for the response! Yes, I'm fine with using a bpo kernel version.
> > Currently we are using the kernel version 6.12.32-1~bpo12+1. Is it possible to
> > backport the change to the bookworm bpo kernel?
>
> As this change was requested too late for trixie, it is not suitable for
> bookworm-backports. In general, <release-N>-backports can only be used
> for backports from <release-N+1>.
>
> There *are* also <release-N>-backports-sloppy suites which can contain
> backports from <release-N+2>, but I have never uploaded kernel packages
> to those and I don't plan to start.
Thanks for the explanation. I see there is already a branch called
6.12-backports [1], but it is a bit outdated. Am I able to request for the
backport to trixie bpo kernel now or do I need to wait until the final
trixie release?
Thanks,
Will
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/carnil/linux/-/tree/6.12-backports?ref_type=heads
Reply to: