[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1108250: firmware-intel-graphics: i915 timeout errors after firmware upgrade



Hi Ben,

Thanks for reaching out.

It appears that the bug has been gone with a kernel upgrade to 6.12.32+bpo-amd64 (and firmware-intel-graphics on 20250410-2~bpo12+1).

Its running on the newer kernel/firmware for several days now without any issues. So, it was probably a kernel issue (although I don't know why downgrading the firmware package had worked, too).

So, I guess we can close the issue.

Best
Maximilian


lspci -nnvv:

00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series SoC Transaction Register [8086:0f00] (rev 11)
       Subsystem: Intel Corporation Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series SoC Transaction Register [8086:0f31]
       Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
       Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 0
       Kernel driver in use: iosf_mbi_pci

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series Graphics & Display [8086:0f31] (rev 11) (prog-if 00 [VGA con
troller])
       DeviceName:  Onboard IGD
       Subsystem: Intel Corporation Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series Graphics & Display [8086:0f31]
       Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
       Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
       Latency: 0
       Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 103
       Region 0: Memory at 90000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4M]
       Region 2: Memory at 80000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
       Region 4: I/O ports at e080 [size=8]
       Expansion ROM at 000c0000 [virtual] [disabled] [size=128K]
       Capabilities: <access denied>
       Kernel driver in use: i915
       Kernel modules: i915



Reply to: