Hello Alessandro, On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 12:35:54PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Wed 18/Jun/2025 22:26:03 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > So can you please check if that problem also happens with 6.12 or better > > still on 6.15, please? > > (Note that 6.12.31 has another amdgpu bug, so please make sure to test > > at least 6.12.32 (that is, take the kernel package from testing and not > > backports, or wait until backports are updated accordingly); > > experimental has 6.15.) > > I found that before installing linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64 I ran linux-image-6.1.0-34-amd64, which worked: > > ale@pcale:~/tmp$ dpkg -l linux-image\* |tail -6 > rc linux-image-6.1.0-34-amd64 6.1.135-1 amd64 Linux 6.1 for 64-bit PCs (signed) > un linux-image-6.1.0-34-amd64-unsigned <none> <none> (no description available) > ii linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64 6.1.140-1 amd64 Linux 6.1 for 64-bit PCs (signed) > un linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64-unsigned <none> <none> (no description available) > ii linux-image-amd64 6.1.140-1 amd64 Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package) > un linux-image-generic <none> <none> (no description available) > > I'm unclear about the relationship among Devuan/ Debian 6.1.0-37, > 6.1.140-1 numbering and the 6.15 or 6.12 used by kernel.org. I get > the following: I don't know if Devuan does their own kernel packaging, but for Debian it's as follows: The kernel package name is linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64 and it's version is 6.1.140-1. That corresponds to upstream's 6.1.140 release. "6.1.0-37" has no relevance in the mapping, though it's no coincidence that it starts with "6.1.". For newer kernels the naming scheme is different, but in it says true that the version of the kernel packages correspond to upstreams version. > ale@pcale:~/tmp$ uname -a > Linux pcale 6.1.0-37-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.140-1 (2025-05-22) x86_64 GNU/Linux > > and > > ale@pcale:~/tmp$ dpkg -s linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64 > Package: linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64 > Status: install ok installed > Priority: optional > Section: kernel > Installed-Size: 399275 > Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org> > Architecture: amd64 > Source: linux-signed-amd64 (6.1.140+1) > Version: 6.1.140-1 > Replaces: linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64-unsigned > Depends: kmod, linux-base (>= 4.3~), initramfs-tools (>= 0.120+deb8u2) | linux-initramfs-tool > Recommends: firmware-linux-free, apparmor > Suggests: linux-doc-6.1, debian-kernel-handbook, grub-pc | grub-efi-amd64 | extlinux > Breaks: fwupdate (<< 12-7), initramfs-tools (<< 0.120+deb8u2), wireless-regdb (<< 2019.06.03-1~) > Conflicts: linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64-unsigned > Description: Linux 6.1 for 64-bit PCs (signed) > The Linux kernel 6.1 and modules for use on PCs with AMD64, Intel 64 or > VIA Nano processors. > . > The kernel image and modules are signed for use with Secure Boot. > Built-Using: linux (= 6.1.140-1) > Homepage: https://www.kernel.org/ > > > On the Devuan repository there is also a linux-image-6.1.0-36-amd64, > which looks like the one before what I have now. I find also a > linux-image-6.12.12+bpo-amd64, which as an installed size about 1/3 of > and linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64. I wonder what's the difference. The difference is that for newer kernels the modules are compressed. > I paste both descriptions below. Would you please shed some light on > what should I install? > > > ale@pcale:~/tmp$ apt-cache show linux-image-6.12.12+bpo-amd64 > Package: linux-image-6.12.12+bpo-amd64 > Version: 6.12.12-1~bpo12+1 > Installed-Size: 105221 > Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org> > Architecture: amd64 > Replaces: linux-image-6.12.12+bpo-amd64-unsigned > Depends: kmod, linux-base (>= 4.3~), initramfs-tools (>= 0.120+deb8u2) | linux-initramfs-tool > Conflicts: linux-image-6.12.12+bpo-amd64-unsigned > Breaks: fwupdate (<< 12-7), initramfs-tools (<< 0.120+deb8u2), wireless-regdb (<< 2019.06.03-1~) > Homepage: https://www.kernel.org/ > Built-Using: linux (= 6.12.12-1~bpo12+1) > Recommends: apparmor > Description-en: Linux 6.12 for 64-bit PCs (signed) > The Linux kernel 6.12 and modules for use on PCs with AMD64, Intel 64 or > VIA Nano processors. > . > The kernel image is signed for use with Secure Boot. > Description-md5: 224c8e7ad16235c8d318cebf70217775 > Source: linux-signed-amd64 (6.12.12+1~bpo12+1) > Suggests: firmware-linux-free, linux-doc-6.12, debian-kernel-handbook, grub-pc | grub-efi-amd64 | extlinux > Section: kernel > Priority: optional > Filename: pool/DEBIAN/main/l/linux-signed-amd64/linux-image-6.12.12+bpo-amd64_6.12.12-1~bpo12+1_amd64.deb > Size: 104999700 > SHA256: 9690bbafdd63cae33cf54d63e040e017f402fcc4b4ebc678438ef133ed736bc7 > > > > > ale@pcale:~/tmp$ apt-cache show linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64 > Package: linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64 > Version: 6.1.140-1 > Installed-Size: 399275 > Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org> > Architecture: amd64 > Replaces: linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64-unsigned > Depends: kmod, linux-base (>= 4.3~), initramfs-tools (>= 0.120+deb8u2) | linux-initramfs-tool > Conflicts: linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64-unsigned > Breaks: fwupdate (<< 12-7), initramfs-tools (<< 0.120+deb8u2), wireless-regdb (<< 2019.06.03-1~) > Homepage: https://www.kernel.org/ > Built-Using: linux (= 6.1.140-1) > Recommends: firmware-linux-free, apparmor > Description-en: Linux 6.1 for 64-bit PCs (signed) > The Linux kernel 6.1 and modules for use on PCs with AMD64, Intel 64 or > VIA Nano processors. > . > The kernel image and modules are signed for use with Secure Boot. > Description-md5: eaf7b81be84ec12eb25fe90a4bac0f60 > Source: linux-signed-amd64 (6.1.140+1) > Suggests: linux-doc-6.1, debian-kernel-handbook, grub-pc | grub-efi-amd64 | extlinux > Section: kernel > Priority: optional > Filename: pool/DEBIAN-SECURITY/updates/main/l/linux-signed-amd64/linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64_6.1.140-1_amd64.deb > Size: 69078572 > SHA256: cba358b526f20a637a4442ca220dd7fcd71f0b87956cb81b162e5a390ef0223c Try installing http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-signed-amd64/linux-image-6.15-amd64_6.15.3-1~exp1_amd64.deb . The MD5 sum should be c41ea7cd2bf35dc2ef13b6502df9dac0. Note that you should better uninstall that package after the test again because it will probably prevent that you benefit from further security fixes. Please report back if the problem occurs with that kernel version, too. Best regards Uwe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature