[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#859066: marked as done (linux-image-*: recommend firmware-ath9k-htc)



Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:55:12 +0000
with message-id <406a24cc84d37ec495c30f4c14bd3e975adeec2e.camel@posteo.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#859066: linux-image-*: recommend firmware-ath9k-htc
has caused the Debian Bug report #859066,
regarding linux-image-*: recommend firmware-ath9k-htc
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
859066: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859066
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux
Version: 4.10~rc6-1~exp1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: open-ath9k-htc-firmware@packages.debian.org

Now that open-ath9k-htc-firmware has been accepted into Debian
unstable, please add "Recommends: firmware-ath9k-htc" to the
metadata for the linux-image-* packages in Debian experimental.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> Can we close this old bug (i.e. by now doing nothing)?

As the primary uploader for firmware-ath9k-htc, I agree, so I'm doing so now. firmware-linux-free has had a Recommends on firmware-ath9k-htc for a while now and this is the right thing to do so users who need it will have it. Tangents discussed in the bug are no longer relevant; the firmware binary is no longer installed under a development filename (this was a hack to permit installation alongside the firmware-atheros package) and no ABI-breaking major release has happened since 1.4.0.

I admire your care in evaluating kernel-related bug reports and I'll try to do the same as I broaden my interest in the kernel.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---

Reply to: