[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1020597: marked as done (r8169 transmit queue 0 timed out)

Your message dated Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:07:14 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <20250220140714.14D1EBE2EE7@eldamar.lan>
and subject line Closing this bug (BTS maintenance for src:linux bugs)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1020597,
regarding r8169 transmit queue 0 timed out
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1020597: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020597
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-image-5.10.0-17-amd64
Version: 5.10.136-1

[651163.019588] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[651163.019767] NETDEV WATCHDOG: enp1s0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out
[651163.019928] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:467
dev_watchdog+0x260/0x270
[651163.020071] Modules linked in: nls_utf8 cifs libarc4 dns_resolver
fscache libdes tcp_diag udp_diag inet_diag tun cmac algif_hash algif_s
kcipher af_alg bnep nft_chain_nat xt_MASQUERADE nf_nat nft_counter
xt_tcpudp xt_state xt_conntrack nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6
nf_defrag_ipv
4 amdgpu gpu_sched nft_compat nf_tables libcrc32c crc32c_generic
nfnetlink uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2
videob
uf2_common videodev mc rtsx_usb_ms snd_hda_codec_realtek memstick
snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_codec_hdmi ledtrig_audio snd_hda_intel
snd_i
ntel_dspcfg soundwire_intel soundwire_generic_allocation snd_soc_core
btusb edac_mce_amd btrtl btbcm btintel nls_ascii bluetooth nls_cp437 s
nd_compress soundwire_cadence snd_hda_codec vfat fat snd_hda_core
jitterentropy_rng kvm snd_hwdep soundwire_bus snd_pcm drbg radeon
irqbypas
s ansi_cprng ecdh_generic snd_timer ecc snd ghash_clmulni_intel crc16
soundcore ideapad_laptop aesni_intel sparse_keymap libaes ttm rfkill c
rypto_simd cryptd wmi
[651163.020621]  glue_helper joydev drm_kms_helper serio_raw sg cec
evdev ccp i2c_algo_bit efi_pstore sp5100_tco pcspkr watchdog
fam15h_powe
r k10temp rng_core acpi_cpufreq ac button drm configfs fuse efivarfs
ip_tables x_tables autofs4 jfs rtsx_usb_sdmmc mmc_core rtsx_usb sd_mod
sr_mod t10_pi cdrom crc_t10dif crct10dif_generic ahci xhci_pci libahci
xhci_hcd crct10dif_pclmul crct10dif_common libata ehci_pci r8169 ehci
_hcd realtek crc32_pclmul mdio_devres scsi_mod usbcore psmouse libphy
crc32c_intel i2c_piix4 usb_common battery video
[651163.022997] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted
5.10.0-17-amd64 #1 Debian 5.10.136-1
[651163.023140] Hardware name: LENOVO INVALID/VIUU4, BIOS 1QCN32WW 08/18/2016
[651163.023291] RIP: 0010:dev_watchdog+0x260/0x270
[651163.023375] Code: eb a9 48 8b 1c 24 c6 05 5f be 0d 01 01 48 89 df
e8 35 75 fa ff 44 89 e9 48 89 de 48 c7 c7 78 cf 96 8d 48 89 c2 e8 b5 9
9 14 00 <0f> 0b eb 86 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 41
[651163.023568] RSP: 0018:ffffa3a500104eb0 EFLAGS: 00010282
[651163.023749] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8ed5002d6000 RCX:
0000000000000000
[651163.023883] RDX: ffff8ed51b4ac760 RSI: ffff8ed51b49ca00 RDI:
0000000000000300
[651163.023977] RBP: ffff8ed5002d63dc R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
ffffa3a500104cd0
[651163.024099] R10: ffffa3a500104cc8 R11: ffffffff8decb448 R12:
ffff8ed507f18c80
[651163.024222] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8ed5002d6480 R15:
0000000000000001
[651163.024349] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8ed51b480000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[651163.027477] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[651163.035480] CR2: 00007f8ca499dd00 CR3: 000000010225a000 CR4:
00000000000406e0
[651163.039535] Call Trace:
[651163.043484]  <IRQ>
[651163.051482]  ? pfifo_fast_enqueue+0x150/0x150
[651163.055477]  call_timer_fn+0x29/0x100
[651163.059476]  __run_timers.part.0+0x1d9/0x250
[651163.067477]  ? ktime_get+0x38/0xa0
[651163.071478]  ? native_x2apic_icr_read+0x20/0x20
[651163.075476]  ? lapic_next_event+0x1d/0x30
[651163.083476]  ? clockevents_program_event+0x8d/0xf0
[651163.087477]  run_timer_softirq+0x26/0x50
[651163.091476]  __do_softirq+0xc5/0x279
[651163.095476]  asm_call_irq_on_stack+0x12/0x20
[651163.103476]  </IRQ>
[651163.107477]  do_softirq_own_stack+0x37/0x50
[651163.111477]  irq_exit_rcu+0x92/0xc0
[651163.115476]  sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x36/0x80
[651163.119476]  asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
[651163.127475] RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0xc7/0x350
[651163.131476] Code: 8b 3d 5d da 14 73 e8 78 0a a0 ff 49 89 c5 0f 1f
44 00 00 31 ff e8 e9 15 a0 ff 45 84 ff 0f 85 fe 00 00 00 fb 66 0f 1f 4
4 00 00 <45> 85 f6 0f 88 0a 01 00 00 49 63 c6 4c 2b 2c 24 48 8d 14 40 48 8d
[651163.139476] RSP: 0018:ffffa3a5000bfea8 EFLAGS: 00000246
[651163.147477] RAX: ffff8ed51b4afd40 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX:
0002503ab4787fa4
[651163.151476] RDX: 00000000000001fa RSI: 0002503ab4787fa4 RDI:
0000000000000000
[651163.155477] RBP: ffff8ed507c3c400 R08: 0002503ab478819e R09:
0000000000000001
[651163.159477] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 000000000000f456 R12:
ffffffff8dfb9180
[651163.163475] R13: 0002503ab478819e R14: 0000000000000002 R15:
0000000000000000
[651163.171477]  ? cpuidle_enter_state+0xb7/0x350
[651163.175477]  cpuidle_enter+0x29/0x40
[651163.179478]  do_idle+0x1f3/0x2b0
[651163.183477]  cpu_startup_entry+0x19/0x20
[651163.187476]  secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xb0/0xbb
[651163.191476] ---[ end trace 4cb2b634af66d097 ]---



-- 
Jiann-Ming Su

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi

This bug was filed for a very old kernel or the bug is old itself
without resolution.

If you can reproduce it with

- the current version in unstable/testing
- the latest kernel from backports

please reopen the bug, see https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
for details.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---
Reply to: