[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#945157: marked as done (Wrong system time on DHCOM i.MX6 due to missing RTC driver)

Your message dated Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:37:35 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <20250220113735.65511BE2EE7@eldamar.lan>
and subject line Closing this bug (BTS maintenance for src:linux bugs)
has caused the Debian Bug report #945157,
regarding Wrong system time on DHCOM i.MX6 due to missing RTC driver
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
945157: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=945157
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Title: Wrong system time on DHCOM i.MX6 due to missing RTC driver
Package: linux-image-4.19.0-6-armmp
Version: 4.19.67-2+deb10u2
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, waldi@debian.org, maks@debian.org, ben@decadent.org.uk, carnil@debian.org

When booting on DHCOM i.MX6 Quad with device tree "imx6q-dhcom-pdk2.dtb"
we always have a wrong system time.
This behavior is related to the missing RTC driver in the config of armmp.

I suggest adding "CONFIG_RTC_DRV_RV3029C2=y" to the config file
"debian/config/armhf/config" in the repo "https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux".

Regards,


Johann Neuhauser

DH electronics GmbH


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi

This bug was filed for a very old kernel or the bug is old itself
without resolution.

If you can reproduce it with

- the current version in unstable/testing
- the latest kernel from backports

please reopen the bug, see https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
for details.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---
Reply to: