[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1093734: nfs-kernel-server: fails to complete setup during upgrade (stuck while restarting nfs-kernel-server.service)



On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:12:51 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:

[...]
> By the way, I am also experiencing a huge performance hit on the I/O
> through the NFS shares.
[...]

I am more and more puzzled.

Now, after some (irrelevant?) package upgrades:

  Will install 12 packages, and remove 0 packages.
  54.3 kB of disk space will be used
  ========================================
  [UPGRADE] fonts-lyx:amd64 2.4.2.1-1 -> 2.4.3-1
  [UPGRADE] gnustep-base-common:amd64 1.30.0-8 -> 1.30.0-9
  [UPGRADE] gnustep-base-runtime:amd64 1.30.0-8 -> 1.30.0-9
  [UPGRADE] libgnustep-base1.30:amd64 1.30.0-8 -> 1.30.0-9
  [UPGRADE] libpango-1.0-0:amd64 1.56.0-3 -> 1.56.1-1
  [UPGRADE] libpangocairo-1.0-0:amd64 1.56.0-3 -> 1.56.1-1
  [UPGRADE] libpangoft2-1.0-0:amd64 1.56.0-3 -> 1.56.1-1
  [UPGRADE] libvulkan1:amd64 1.3.296.0-1 -> 1.4.304.0-1
  [UPGRADE] publicsuffix:amd64 20241206.1516-0.1 -> 20250108.1153-0.1
  [UPGRADE] python3-fonttools:amd64 4.55.3-1 -> 4.55.3-2
  [UPGRADE] python3-urllib3:amd64 2.2.3-4 -> 2.3.0-1
  [UPGRADE] shared-mime-info:amd64 2.4-5+b1 -> 2.4-5+b2
  ========================================

the performance hit seems to have gone away.

On $server :

  326091584 bytes (326 MB, 311 MiB) copied, 1.0812 s, 302 MB/s

On each of the $client boxes (some upgraded and rebooted, some not yet):

  326091584 bytes (326 MB, 311 MiB) copied, 2.64994 s, 123 MB/s
  326091584 bytes (326 MB, 311 MiB) copied, 2.49485 s, 131 MB/s
  326091584 bytes (326 MB, 311 MiB) copied, 2.7485 s, 119 MB/s
  326091584 bytes (326 MB, 311 MiB) copied, 2.40638 s, 136 MB/s
  326091584 bytes (326 MB, 311 MiB) copied, 2.58302 s, 126 MB/s
  326091584 bytes (326 MB, 311 MiB) copied, 2.75766 s, 118 MB/s
  326091584 bytes (326 MB, 311 MiB) copied, 2.76305 s, 118 MB/s
  [...]

Was I seeing ghosts? Am I seeing ghosts?
I really cannot understand...

Let's assume that the performance is back to "expected" values.
I will not file any separate bug report about the NFS performance, for
the time being.

Sorry for the "noise" about performance, let's focus back on the
nfs-kernel-server upgrade that failed to complete.

Please let me know whether there's any progress.
Bye and thanks for your kind assistance!



-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/
 There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

Attachment: pgp3K7lrpvkAc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: