[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1092869: marked as done (Kernel problem, system / screen keeps freezing)



Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2025 19:23:52 +0100
with message-id <[🔎] Z41DOIZXVgvtrEgZ@eldamar.lan>
and subject line Re: Bug#1092869: linux-image-6.1.0-29-amd64: Freezing reappeared
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092869,
regarding Kernel problem, system / screen keeps freezing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1092869: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092869
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-6.1.0-29-amd64
Version: 6.1.123-1

After upgrading from linux-image-6.1.0-28-amd64 (Version: 6.1.119-1) to linux-image-6.1.0-29-amd64 (Version: 6.1.123-1) the screen of my gnome desktop environment kept freezing. I did a journalctl -xe and it showed some amdgpu-errors (see screenshot attached). Rebooting the 28er kernel brought back a stable system.

Yours,
Markus

Attachment: screenshot.png
Description: PNG image


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux
Source-Version: 6.1.124-1

Hi Markus,

On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 05:55:47PM +0100, Markus Schmees wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
> 
> I installed 6.1.24 as soon as it was released (2025-01-15) and the bug did
> not reappear since then. The previous kernel wouldn't run 4 days straight
> without freezing, so I assume that you already fixed the bug in the new
> kernel.

Thanks for the quick feedback. In this case I'm closing the bug, and
in case it re-triggers feel free to reach out again.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---

Reply to: