Bug#1090811: please set linux-sysctl-defaults to Priority: important
- To: Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org>, 1090811@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Subject: Bug#1090811: please set linux-sysctl-defaults to Priority: important
- From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2025 07:08:40 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] Z3Tb6Cy1wi7n0y_V@eldamar.lan>
- Reply-to: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>, 1090811@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <Z2gp6qiWm9oNrSM2@doom.morgul.net>
- References: <173462091548.392662.9518785537452676756.reportbug@doom.morgul.net> <20241219152449.kuwjpdkawnsdv6hp@mraw.org> <Z2RT7aqWGupi9uJK@doom.morgul.net> <173462091548.392662.9518785537452676756.reportbug@doom.morgul.net> <CAHnKnK1VghcpUYuqfU1qrPisebUqji5Z3AJvf+SYhU7Na0awzQ@mail.gmail.com> <173462091548.392662.9518785537452676756.reportbug@doom.morgul.net> <Z2gp6qiWm9oNrSM2@doom.morgul.net> <173462091548.392662.9518785537452676756.reportbug@doom.morgul.net>
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 10:02:02AM -0500, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 03:52:55PM -0800, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> > > Regarding tasksel vs. Priority, the latter has a potential for a much
> > > wider impact: lots of Debian system are installed without d-i and/or
> > > tasksel, and most if not all would get the package via Priority.
> > (Think
> > > of all the tools building Debian images, chroots, containers, etc., on
> > > top of debootstrap/mmdebstrap/etc.)
> >
> > I'm not sure it's the case that most of those other systems install
> > Priority: standard. Debootstrap certainly doesn't by itself, and I
> > don't think the debuerreotype tool for building OCI images does either.
> > In any case, your point still stands. I'll re-assign this to general
> > for now, and we can discuss the options in a broader context.
> >
> > FWIW, we have added linux-sysctl-defaults to the sid/trixie VM images
> > built by the cloud team.
> >
> > noah
> >
> > I think "Priority: important" is probably appropriate here?
> > [2]https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/-/blob/c019a546a37b9284f0503c955d0f198044a7e2f0/scripts/debian-common#L29
> > Then it's installed by default in standard / d-i, but not part of minbase,
> > buildd, etc.
> > (It wouldn't affect/do anything in most container images or runtimes
> > anyhow, which is also an argument for it being harmless to include. 🤷)
>
> Hi kernel team. Per the earlier discussion in this bug, please raise
> the priority of linux-sysctl-defaults to important in order to ensure
> that it's present by default in typical Debian installations.
>
> Patch is attached.
I do not see explict voices against the changes, Cyril am I correct
that this is fine as well from d-i point of view?
I have applied the patch to our debian/latest branch but have *not*
yet uploaded.
Regards,
Salvatore
Reply to: