Bug#1063754: fat-modules: SD corruption upon opening file on Linux desktop
- To: Bud Heal <budheal508@gmail.com>, 1063754@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Subject: Bug#1063754: fat-modules: SD corruption upon opening file on Linux desktop
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 22:27:03 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] nu65zht76tmm3txzrixu2xd2b5vs6mvpwr33fa5hpepioifxvn@2kpkkon4siqy>
- Reply-to: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>, 1063754@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <7328afe1-fb9d-873d-668e-baa846cb7ee5@gmail.com>
- References: <170772763459.41578.8101655963036654510.reportbug@notubiz.lo-lh.com> <ffd8f1dbb2849a62a095109f5c956b4f7721f746.camel@decadent.org.uk> <CAN57kWuLTQNNMVGUiK8U5YyhyYuSmCTj0fQ+e+d7zWpWhdi_uw@mail.gmail.com> <86af316491511c00c817e2680f969e9fc940f63b.camel@decadent.org.uk> <CAN57kWvfMQfGsuHw0SKVcQ9gpgtAxxCKi9iob8_MHA=vOACmfA@mail.gmail.com> <17d98e38cba45d402ef52983e8a6261b9be06df3.camel@decadent.org.uk> <a40e2d27-fb31-5771-ccab-2ff4508f0cc9@gmail.com> <8617a2577c8bbcd4390157065c288b006215f017.camel@decadent.org.uk> <170772763459.41578.8101655963036654510.reportbug@notubiz.lo-lh.com> <7328afe1-fb9d-873d-668e-baa846cb7ee5@gmail.com> <170772763459.41578.8101655963036654510.reportbug@notubiz.lo-lh.com>
Control: close -1
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 10:17:37PM -0400, Bud Heal wrote:
> I am happy to hear that you are looking at this.
>
> I did create at least one 32GB filesystem but it was too large even
> compressed - but suitable for uploading.
>
> Now that buster is obsoleted, and bookworm does not exhibit the errors
> (rather, its operations appear to avoid the errors with workarounds - each
> of which slows copying, but one cannot ask for more) I will verify that on
> Bullseye first.
We didn't receive any further feedback on this bug report and given that
bookworm is fixed I close this bug.
If you think that's wrong or find new evidence, please report back and
reopen.
Best regards
Uwe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: