Bug#1072385: marked as done (Debian Backports Kernel 6.7 Breaks Gnome Night Light.)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Jun 2024 16:47:26 +0200
with message-id <[🔎] ZlyF_txmWAF8biQz@eldamar.lan>
and subject line Re: Bug#1072385: Debian Backports Kernel 6.7 Breaks Gnome Night Light.
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072385,
regarding Debian Backports Kernel 6.7 Breaks Gnome Night Light.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1072385: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072385
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package:linux-image-6.7.12+bpo-amd64
Version: 6.7.12-1~bpo12+1 amd64 64-bit PCs (signed)
Debian backports kernel 6.7 breaks gnome night light. Night light is not working. When I run it with backports kernel 6.6 it starts working.
I am using Pardus 23.1 Gnome and libc6 2.36-8cross1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: reassign -1 src:linux 6.7.12-1~bpo12+1
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 09:50:06AM +0300, Ersin Dikerler wrote:
> Package:linux-image-6.7.12+bpo-amd64
> Version: 6.7.12-1~bpo12+1 amd64 64-bit PCs (signed)
>
> Debian backports kernel 6.7 breaks gnome night light. Night light is
> not working. When I run it with backports kernel 6.6 it starts
> working.
>
> I am using Pardus 23.1 Gnome and libc6 2.36-8cross1
This is slightly unpsecific and is not in a plain Debian system (I do
realize Parsus is built upon Debian).
I'm closing thus the bug as well after reassigning. But if you can
reproduce the issue with a plain Debian system, please do as well test
with the kernel in unstable 6.8.12-1.
Regards,
Salvatore
--- End Message ---
Reply to: