On Monday, 20 May 2024 21:07:49 CEST Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > - I did read you cannot trigger with 5.15. If you build 6.1.90 from > upstream without Debian patches I assume you can trigger the issue > likewise? If so could you bisect the changes introducing the issue? If the test with the upstream 6.1.90 version also has this problem, there's another (series of) test(s) worth doing, which could shorten the bisect operation significantly. I got the impression that you have only tried it with version 6.1.90. Have you tried it with earlier versions in the 6.1 series to see if the issue is present there? Via https://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux-signed-arm64/ you can find earlier versions from the 6.1 series already compiled and packaged. To take version 6.1.52 as (random) example: - click on the ``6.1.52+1`` link - In the ``Binary packages`` list, click on the linux-image-6.1.0-X-arm64 link, where 'X' is 12 in this case - Click the ``linux-image-6.1.0-12-arm64_6.1.52-1_arm64.deb`` link to download the deb file which you can then install as root or with sudo by executing ``apt install ./linux-image-<version-info>_arm64.deb`` If the problem does NOT occur with 6.1.52-1, then you try a higher version. Continue that process until you've found the latest version that works and the earliest version where it stopped working. If the problem also occurs with 6.1.52-1, then you try an (even) older version. This is to test whether it was a regression *within* the 6.1 series and if so, to get the narrowest range without having to compile yourself. HTH
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.