[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1070083: linux: Do we still need sched-autogroup-disabled.patch in 2024?



Source: linux
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

I can't see why something which can be done with a kernel boot parameter or a
sysctl variable
needs to be forced in the source since 2011. Also, the very existence of this
new default is non-transparent for anyone relying on official kernel
documentation. Is it even mentioned in any README or something? Because I
couldn't find anything.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (991, 'stable-updates'), (991, 'stable-security'), (991, 'stable'), (99, 'testing'), (90, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.6.13-bootes0-p-1000 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en_US
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled


Reply to: