On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:25:27 +0100 Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:03:11AM +0000, Colm Buckley wrote: > > Why was this never the case before? And can you be more precise about what > > "stuff" is missing? Is there a previous bug report I can reference? > > It complains loudly about BTF. With the new vmlinux.h shipped in the headers package, the BTF case should be covered. I think we should nudge packages to use that, rather than looking at the kernel image, or worse sysfs from the running kernel, which is completely wrong for obvious reasons. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part