Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2024-02-02): > One thing is still unresolved, thus additonally to the explicit CC to > kibi, as well including debian-boot. We have the armel d-i situation > not yet resolved, debian-boot folks, do you have any imput on the > situation from the thread in > https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2024/01/msg00089.html ? > My gut feeling from what was discussed is that nobody will ever use > the d-i on armel. I'm not sure how much time armel will stick around (for existing systems), but it looks to me that d-i/armel is no longer relevant. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature