[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1030874: marked as done (linux-headers-6.1.0-3-amd64: Dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-headers-amd64)

Your message dated Wed, 8 Feb 2023 20:41:35 +0100
with message-id <Y+P67/RWKo5pKJXT@eldamar.lan>
and subject line Re: Bug#1030874: linux-headers-6.1.0-3-amd64: Dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-headers-amd64
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030874,
regarding linux-headers-6.1.0-3-amd64: Dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-headers-amd64
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1030874: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030874
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Package: linux-headers-6.1.0-3-amd64

Version: 6.1.8-1

Severity: serious

Tags: ftbfs

Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

X-Debbugs-Cc: smithcu@hush.com


Dear Maintainer,


*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***


* What led up to the situation?

* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or

ineffective)?

* What was the outcome of this action?

* What outcome did you expect instead?


*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***



-- System Information:

Debian Release: bookworm/sid

APT prefers testing

APT policy: (500, 'testing')

Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)


Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)

Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not

set

Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash

Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

LSM: AppArmor: enabled


Versions of packages linux-headers-6.1.0-3-amd64 depends on:

ii linux-compiler-gcc-12-x86 6.1.8-1

ii linux-headers-6.1.0-3-common 6.1.8-1

ii linux-kbuild-6.1 6.1.8-1


linux-headers-6.1.0-3-amd64 recommends no packages.


linux-headers-6.1.0-3-amd64 suggests no packages.


-- no debconf information






--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:02:08AM -0800, Curtis Dean Smith wrote:
> Package: linux-headers-6.1.0-3-amd64 
> 
> 	Version: 6.1.8-1 
> 
> 	Severity: serious 
> 
> 	Tags: ftbfs 
> 
> 	Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in
> the past) 
> 
> 	X-Debbugs-Cc: smithcu@hush.com 
> 	Dear Maintainer, 
> 	*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where
> appropriate *** 
> 	   * What led up to the situation? 
> 
> 	   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or 
> 
> 	     ineffective)? 
> 
> 	   * What was the outcome of this action? 
> 
> 	   * What outcome did you expect instead? 
> 	*** End of the template - remove these template lines *** 
> 	-- System Information: 
> 
> 	Debian Release: bookworm/sid 
> 
> 	  APT prefers testing 
> 
> 	  APT policy: (500, 'testing') 
> 
> 	Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) 
> 	Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT) 
> 
> 	Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
> LANGUAGE not  
> 
> 	set 
> 
> 	Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash 
> 
> 	Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) 
> 
> 	LSM: AppArmor: enabled 
> 	Versions of packages linux-headers-6.1.0-3-amd64 depends on: 
> 
> 	ii  linux-compiler-gcc-12-x86     6.1.8-1 
> 
> 	ii  linux-headers-6.1.0-3-common  6.1.8-1 
> 
> 	ii  linux-kbuild-6.1              6.1.8-1 
> 	linux-headers-6.1.0-3-amd64 recommends no packages. 
> 	linux-headers-6.1.0-3-amd64 suggests no packages. 
> 	-- no debconf information 
> p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }

Closing this bug, as it does not seem to contain any actionable
information. Did you sent the report prematurely? If so feel free to
please reopen the bug and add the information.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---
Reply to: