Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets
- To: 1050256@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>, pkg-systemd-maintainers <pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Mathias Gibbens <gibmat@debian.org>
- Subject: Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 22:21:02 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 38461b24-1b42-45f7-98d6-e6e353c0d203@debian.org>
- Reply-to: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>, 1050256@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <8f68c83b-1856-4fa2-8408-06ae36696698@debian.org>
- References: <169271330498.34427.2191706613553030083.reportbug@pluto.milchstrasse.xx> <2f3a5e85-b81f-43dc-8723-b7a5d6e26cf2@debian.org> <1864029.tdWV9SEqCh@tux.boltz.de.vu> <8b47aa02-2081-4ed8-bd1b-649a58c1d569@debian.org> <88b3b380-3ae9-4747-bad0-01d2ca1ea634@debian.org> <169271330498.34427.2191706613553030083.reportbug@pluto.milchstrasse.xx> <9cf9f979b755ad2bb7c0de7ca4b9c8d9a9e1cefa.camel@debian.org> <ZPMX8Wo1+2ICj8+K@debian.org> <d5a0d568-8666-4f4a-a426-757d68215724@debian.org> <aea599a6-219c-4158-850f-d7168a595d21@debian.org> <da160344-8135-4eab-9261-bb1552238ad3@debian.org> <8f68c83b-1856-4fa2-8408-06ae36696698@debian.org> <8f68c83b-1856-4fa2-8408-06ae36696698@debian.org> <169271330498.34427.2191706613553030083.reportbug@pluto.milchstrasse.xx>
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 20:54:17 +0200 Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> wrote:
On 09-09-2023 13:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
> All ci.d.n workers (except riscv64) now run the kernel from
> bookworm-backports. systemd passes it's autopkgtest again in unstable,
> testing and stable.
We're having issues [1] with the (backports and) unstable kernel on our
main amd64 host, so we reverted back to the stable kernel for amd64.
Paul
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052130
We're having issues [2] with the backports kernel on arm64 so our arm64,
armhf and armel hosts are back to the previous backports (arm64) kernel.
I'm slightly wondering if the next point release (on Saturday) will
bring us a fixed kernel for this issue? Given that this is the second
time in 3 months we experience an issue with backports kernels, I think
we'll have to revert our hosts back to stable kernels for
maintainability reasons.
Paul
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/1057282
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Reply to: