Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y?

To: Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org>, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y?
From: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:14:27 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 169693286797.3453145.7694745520755158332@localhost>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] ZSUi_6M1vmdRFTAm@ariel>
References: <[🔎] 169678202078.3029203.13684704010302829243@localhost> <[🔎] 3679117.hVnToU1rA3@bagend> <[🔎] ZSUi_6M1vmdRFTAm@ariel>

Hi,

Quoting Emanuele Rocca (2023-10-10 12:10:07)
> Setting CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y on arm64 is likely safe for us too, but
> we may want to run some benchmark first to see if there are any noticeable
> slowdowns.

I have a couple of arm64 boards here that I can run benchmarks on. What would
you recommend to run to test the effect of CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y?

Thanks!

cheers, josch

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y?
  - From: Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org>

References:
- CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y?
  - From: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org>
- Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y?
  - From: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
- Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y?
  - From: Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y?
Next by Date: Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y?
Previous by thread: Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y?
Next by thread: Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread