Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2023 02:11:41 +0200 with message-id <48da8f52912954063846eccc25157b2387c13cac.camel@decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#1035885: iwlwifi: api flags index 2 larger than supported by driver has caused the Debian Bug report #1035885, regarding iwlwifi: api flags index 2 larger than supported by driver to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1035885: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035885 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: iwlwifi: api flags index 2 larger than supported by driver
- From: "Al Ma" <alma0@ro.ru>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 16:32:42 +0000
- Message-id: <47fb3aa2647e4f938e4cc1880ce6be5f@mail.rambler.ru>
- Reply-to: "Al Ma" <alma0@ro.ru>
Package: firmware-iwlwifiVersion: 20210315-3In the journal log of a machine with the cardAX3000 Dual BandPCE-AX3000Wi-Fi 6 PCI-E AdapterI see this:Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: RAPL PMU: API unit is 2^-32 Joules, 1 fixed counters, 655360 ms ovfl timerMai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: RAPL PMU: hw unit of domain package 2^-14 JoulesMai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: Intel(R) Wireless WiFi driver for LinuxMai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: iwlwifi 0000:b3:00.0: enabling device (0100 -> 0102)Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: cryptd: max_cpu_qlen set to 1000Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: AVX2 version of gcm_enc/dec engaged.Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: AES CTR mode by8 optimization enabledMai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: cx23885: cx23885 driver version 0.0.4 loadedMai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: cx23885 0000:08:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: cx23885: CORE cx23885[0]: subsystem: 0070:f038, board: Hauppauge WinTV-HVR5525 [card=52,autodetected]Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: iwlwifi 0000:b3:00.0: firmware: direct-loading firmware iwlwifi-cc-a0-59.ucodeMai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: iwlwifi 0000:b3:00.0: api flags index 2 larger than supported by driverMai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: iwlwifi 0000:b3:00.0: TLV_FW_FSEQ_VERSION: FSEQ Version: 89.3.35.22Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: iwlwifi 0000:b3:00.0: loaded firmware version 59.601f3a66.0 cc-a0-59.ucode op_mode iwlmvmMai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: iwlwifi 0000:b3:00.0: firmware: failed to load iwl-debug-yoyo.bin (-2)Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: firmware_class: See https://wiki.debian.org/Firmware for information about missing firmwareWhat does “api flags index 2 larger than supported by driver” tell us? Is this something I should be worried about? If so, what to do? I had WiFi-connectivity issues in the past, so I wonder whether this could be a source of these issues or at least contribute to them.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 1035885-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1035885: iwlwifi: api flags index 2 larger than supported by driver
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 02:11:41 +0200
- Message-id: <48da8f52912954063846eccc25157b2387c13cac.camel@decadent.org.uk>
- In-reply-to: <47fb3aa2647e4f938e4cc1880ce6be5f@mail.rambler.ru>
- References: <47fb3aa2647e4f938e4cc1880ce6be5f@mail.rambler.ru>
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 16:32 +0000, Al Ma wrote: > Package: firmware-iwlwifi > Version: 20210315-3 > In the journal log of a machine with the card > AX3000 Dual Band > PCE-AX3000 > Wi-Fi 6 PCI-E Adapter > I see this: > Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: RAPL PMU: API unit is 2^-32 Joules, 1 fixed counters, 655360 ms ovfl timer > Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: RAPL PMU: hw unit of domain package 2^-14 Joules > Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: Intel(R) Wireless WiFi driver for Linux > Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: iwlwifi 0000:b3:00.0: enabling device (0100 -> 0102) > Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: cryptd: max_cpu_qlen set to 1000 > Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: AVX2 version of gcm_enc/dec engaged. > Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: AES CTR mode by8 optimization enabled > Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: cx23885: cx23885 driver version 0.0.4 loaded > Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: cx23885 0000:08:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) > Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: cx23885: CORE cx23885[0]: subsystem: 0070:f038, board: Hauppauge WinTV-HVR5525 [card=52,autodetected] > Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: iwlwifi 0000:b3:00.0: firmware: direct-loading firmware iwlwifi-cc-a0-59.ucode > Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: iwlwifi 0000:b3:00.0: api flags index 2 larger than supported by driver > Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: iwlwifi 0000:b3:00.0: TLV_FW_FSEQ_VERSION: FSEQ Version: 89.3.35.22 > Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: iwlwifi 0000:b3:00.0: loaded firmware version 59.601f3a66.0 cc-a0-59.ucode op_mode iwlmvm > Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: iwlwifi 0000:b3:00.0: firmware: failed to load iwl-debug-yoyo.bin (-2) > Mai 10 16:47:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: firmware_class: See https://wiki.debian.org/Firmware for information about missing firmware > What does “api flags index 2 larger than supported by driver” tell us? Is this something I should be worried about? If so, what to do? I had WiFi-connectivity issues in the past, so I wonder whether this could be a source of these issues or at least contribute to them. It appears to mean that the firmware advertises some features that the driver doesn't know how to use. It doesn't seem to be something you should worry about. If you think this log message should not be a warning, you can raise the issue with the iwlwifi developers on the mailing list <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If you seem to know what you are doing, you'll be given more to do.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---