On Tuesday, 4 April 2023 13:11:16 CEST Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 15:16:42 +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > On Saturday, 18 March 2023 23:10:39 CEST Diederik de Haas wrote: > > > > On Monday, 3 April 2023 14:57:02 CEST Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > Not sure why patchwork still shows v2 of the patch as v4 is available > > > > here: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230308154244.722337-1-hdegoede@redhat.com/ > > > > > > I'll give the patch series you linked in the other reply a go now. > > > > FTR: 2 out of the 3 patches have landed in 6.1.22 > > Thanks for letting me know. I've built 6.1.22 from upstream and it > doesn't seem to crash. That's awesome :-) Let's hope it stays that way now ;-) You may have seen it on IRC already, but could you test a Debian 6.1.20-1 kernel with (only) those patches applied? These are the URLs: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-6.1.y&id=1c5abcb13491da8c049f20462189c12c753ba978 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-6.1.y&id=1e8525f37871741a52370627633962f8bdcab15a If you need help with that, feel free to ask :-) If we know that fixes the issue too, then we have the option of going for a 6.1.20-2 release with just those 2 patches (and what's already in -2 now). TIA, Diederik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.