Bug#1023103: linux-image-5.10.0-14-amd64: Wrong power value on APU2 with bullseye

To: 1023103@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#1023103: linux-image-5.10.0-14-amd64: Wrong power value on APU2 with bullseye
From: Alexis Domjan <adomjan@horus.ch>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2022 14:03:50 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] de27c08c-9b1c-03be-5637-68b2ff5de1ba@horus.ch>
Reply-to: Alexis Domjan <adomjan@horus.ch>, 1023103@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <Y16LmQ7M8qmbuw9K@eldamar.lan>
References: <166711962353.155005.17327569622479133416.reportbug@sxsabase.solarstratos.com> <Y15CMEsxMAqpDFE4@eldamar.lan> <166711962353.155005.17327569622479133416.reportbug@sxsabase.solarstratos.com> <b11f81e3-489f-f8f7-00af-c14bbaed0959@horus.ch> <Y16LmQ7M8qmbuw9K@eldamar.lan> <Y16LmQ7M8qmbuw9K@eldamar.lan> <166711962353.155005.17327569622479133416.reportbug@sxsabase.solarstratos.com>

Hi Salvatore,

Thank you for testing. And before 5.10.113 can you pin point to a
version in which showed sensible versions? If so you have a starting
point to bisect where the problem is introduced which would be very
helpfull to determine the pontential issue.


A friend of mine did these tests and here are the results:

4.19.260 HAS NOT the bug
4.19.264 HAS NOT the bug
5.0.1 HAS the bug
5.1   HAS the bug

So it looks like the bug appeared in kernel 5.

Kind regards,
Alexis Domjan

Reply to:

Prev by Date: linux-signed-i386_6.0.3+1~bpo11+1_source.changes is NEW
Next by Date: Bug#778849: Is "wishlist" appropriate for this?
Previous by thread: linux-signed-i386_6.0.3+1~bpo11+1_source.changes is NEW
Next by thread: Bug#778849: Is "wishlist" appropriate for this?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread