[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1017425: 5.10.0-17-686-pae: repeatedly crashes during initrd loading [PIII]



I have similar problem in Pentium III machine (DELL PowerEdge 1500SC).

[Environment]
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) III CPU family (Tualatin) 1400MHz (SMP)
Memory: 2GB
Debian version: 11.4

linux-image-5.10.0-17-686-pae no longer boots correctly, while
linux-image-5.10.0-16-686-pae works.

In my case, the following kernel panic message is shown.

[    0.676076] Hardware name: Dell Computer Corporation PowerEdge 1500SC,    BIOS A06 10/14/2004
[    0.676134] EIP: __switch_to_asm+0x43/0x5c
[    0.676178] Code: 1d 54 45 ca c7 89 f6 bb 10 00 00 00 e8 07 00 00 00 f3 90 0f ae e8 eb f9 e8 07 00 00 00 f3 90 0f ae e8 eb f9 83 c4 08 4b 75 e2 <0f> ae e8 e8 01 00 00 00 cc 83 c4 04 0f ae e8 9d 5e 5f 5b 5d e9 78
[    0.676238] EAX: c7a94480 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 28494125 EDX: c114b340
[    0.676280] ESI: f6fcea40 EDI: c7a94480 EBP: c7a8de3c ESP: c1145f9c
[    0.676322] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 CS: 00e0 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00210046
[    0.676365] CR0: 80050033 CR2: ff9ff000 CR3: 07cb2000 CR4: 000006f0
[    0.676405] Call Trace:
[    0.676445] Modules linked in:
[    0.676503] ---[ end trace 02deed42763c6547 ]---
[    0.676544] EIP: __switch_to_asm+0x43/0x5c
[    0.676583] Code: 1d 54 45 ca c7 89 f6 bb 10 00 00 00 e8 07 00 00 00 f3 90 0f ae e8 eb f9 e8 07 00 00 00 f3 90 0f ae e8 eb f9 83 c4 08 4b 75 e2 <0f> ae e8 e8 01 00 00 00 cc 83 c4 04 0f ae e8 9d 5e 5f 5b 5d e9 78
[    0.676643) EAX: c7a94480 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 28494125 EDX: c114b340
[    0.676685] ESI: f6fcea40 EDI: c7a94480 EBP: c7a8de3c ESP: c1145f9c
[    0.676739] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 CS: 00e0 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00210046
[    0.676793] CR0: 80050033 CR2: ff9ff000 CR3: 07cb2000 CR4: 000006f0
[    0.676847] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
[    0.676989] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! ]---

I hope this information helps.

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>


Reply to: