[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1009018: linux-image-5.16.0-5-amd64: Shutdown, reboot, and suspend broken on chromebook when module cros_ec_typec is loaded.



Le 2022-04-06 14:02, Vincent Blut a écrit :
> Hi Dan,
> 
> Le 2022-04-05 18:23, Dan Bassett a écrit :
> > Package: src:linux
> > Version: 5.16.14-1
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: upstream
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: bugs@fizix.org
> > 
> > Dear Maintainer,
> > 
> >    * What led up to the situation?
> > 
> >    I upgraded my system from Stable (5.10 kernel) to Testing in order
> >    to get sound working, however, upon upgrade, my system was no longer
> >    able to shutdown, reboot, or suspend properly.  All of these actions
> >    would result in the system hanging, requiring a hard reset.
> > 
> > 
> >    * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> >      ineffective)?
> > 
> >    I manually built a series of kernels to try to narrow down where
> >    the issue was occuring and found that when I disabled the building of
> >    chromebook related platform drivers, my system would happily reboot
> >    and suspend.  I also noticed that the kernel was throwing an error 
> >    at boot when attempting to load the cros_ec_typec module.  Given this
> >    information, I attempted to boot the stock debian kernel
> >    (5.16.0-5-amd64) with the option module_blacklist=cros_ec_typec,
> >    which resulted in a system that rebooted and suspended as expected.
> >    I am unaware of any functionality that I may be losing by not loading
> >    the cros_ec_typec module.
> > 
> > 
> >    * What was the outcome of this action?
> > 
> >    I have a working system, though ideally this module would properly
> >    load on boot (as my hardware configuration seems to want it), and not
> >    break shutdown/reboot/suspend.
> > 
> > 
> >    * What outcome did you expect instead?
> > 
> >    The system should work without disabling relevant kernel modules.
> 
> I think [1], currently applied to Linux 5.18-rc1, will fix this issue.
> 
> Prashant, Benson, should this patch be applied to Linux 5.7+?

I just noticed that it has been commited to the relevant stable trees. Sorry
for the noise!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: