Bug#1005005: Regression from 3c196f056666 ("drm/amdgpu: always reset the asic in suspend (v2)") on suspend?
- To: dod@debian.org, Eric Valette <eric.valette@free.fr>, Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
- Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>, Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>, 1005005@bugs.debian.org, Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>, Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
- Subject: Bug#1005005: Regression from 3c196f056666 ("drm/amdgpu: always reset the asic in suspend (v2)") on suspend?
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 20:00:28 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] b3c39447-c02a-a021-8a4f-499aa962980c@leemhuis.info>
- Reply-to: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>, 1005005@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3873010.MHq7AAxBmi@ylum>
- References: <Ygf7KuWyc0d4HIFu@eldamar.lan> <CADnq5_MWqz7-XhOS4zfuzi3=_nKa72iYaO0BcKNcVDwEvZ+YHw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 61c2b2ce-d749-3723-ad27-f40e1c49d967@leemhuis.info> <[🔎] 3873010.MHq7AAxBmi@ylum> <164405721350.15142.10930772309423612672.reportbug@ylum.maison>
On 21.03.22 19:49, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Monday, 21 March 2022 09:57:59 CET Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Dominique/Salvatore/Eric, what's the status of this regression?
>> According to the debian bug tracker the problem is solved with 5.16 and
>> 5.17, but was 5.15 ever fixed?
>
> I don't think so.
>
> On kernel side, the commit fixing this issue is
> e55a3aea418269266d84f426b3bd70794d3389c8 .
>
> According to the logs of [1] , this commit landed in v5.17-rc3
>
> HTH
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
And from there it among others got backported to 5.15.22:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.15.y&id=8a15ac1786c92dce6ecbeb4e4c237f5f80c2c703
https://lwn.net/Articles/884107/
Another indicator that Eric's problem is something else.
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I'm getting a lot of
reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them and lack
knowledge about most of the areas they concern. I thus unfortunately
will sometimes get things wrong or miss something important. I hope
that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me
in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record
straight.
Reply to: