Fwd: Re: oomadj - bug

[Die Optimisten <inform@die-optimisten.net>]

Hi,

  I'm not sure why that's happening. ps just prints what the kernel decides the oomadj is, it doesn't control it.

=> the problem:

On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 22:34, Die Optimisten <inform@die-optimisten.net> wrote:

Hi!
  how can a subprocess get better oom then its origin?
         seen with chromium (also _without_ suid!)

         change oomadj to 15 of _all_ chrome-processes; opening a new window => created process has oomadj==0 !

thank you

Opti