Bug#959757: This is a regression

To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>, wferi@niif.hu, 959757@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Peter Leipold <pelei@upcmail.hu>
Subject: Bug#959757: This is a regression
From: Peter Leipold <leipold.peter@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 17:32:19 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] d6e61b2b-426c-8ea1-763b-b83c20fd042c@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Peter Leipold <leipold.peter@gmail.com>, 959757@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] YI6g+S0MLSqhrPZq@eldamar.lan>
References: <158862979239.11999.12863664190099877916.reportbug@localhost> <87h7umjjqd.fsf@lant.ki.iif.hu> <[🔎] YI6g+S0MLSqhrPZq@eldamar.lan> <158862979239.11999.12863664190099877916.reportbug@localhost>

Hi, I'm the original reporter. FYI, the problem was fixed with one of the kernel updates on last summer. It's stable since then.

Peter

On 5/2/21 2:54 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 01:15:38PM +0200, wferi@niif.hu wrote:

Control: found -1 5.5.0-0.bpo.2-amd64

I started to see this problem after upgrading from 5.4.0-0.bpo.4-amd64
to 5.5.0-0.bpo.2-amd64.  It goes like:

Do you still have the issue reproducible with a recent kernel from
unstable or buster-backports?

Regards,
Salvatore

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#959757: This is a regression
  - From: wferi@niif.hu
- Bug#959757: This is a regression
  - From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#959757: This is a regression
  - From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>