[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#689962: marked as done (linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: Compile with CONFIG_VIRTIO_CONSOLE=y)



Your message dated Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:19:13 +0200
with message-id <YIXAsRM47wzhYEQA@eldamar.lan>
and subject line Re: Bug#689962: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: Compile with CONFIG_VIRTIO_CONSOLE=y
has caused the Debian Bug report #689962,
regarding linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: Compile with CONFIG_VIRTIO_CONSOLE=y
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
689962: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689962
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64
Version: 3.2.30-1
Severity: normal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Dear Maintainer,

When using a virtio console, we cannot get early boot messages since
it is only available as a module. Wouldn't it make sense to compile it
in-kernel to get the same behaviour as with a serial console?

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=PZqV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 06:50:00PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>  ❦ 24 avril 2021 16:15 +02, Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> 
> > Is this still something we should consider, or can the bug be closed?
> 
> I suppose that's since almost nobody chimes in in all these years, there
> is no need.

Okay let's close it then, and sorry that nobody replied for so long.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---

Reply to: