Bug#923814: Does #923814 dup of #906225?
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 02:30:30PM -0800, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> The kernel versions are quite different, but #923814 reads suspiciously
> like it is a duplicate of #906225.
On double-checking, hit the wrong follow-up address. I was wanting to
advise the maintainers these two looked to potentially be the same bug...
--
(\___(\___(\______ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- ______/)___/)___/)
\BS ( | ehem+sigmsg@m5p.com PGP 87145445 | ) /
\_CS\ | _____ -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O- _____ | / _/
8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445
Reply to: