[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#931507: marked as done (kernel-wedge: HDA sound board detection takes 60s in d-i)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Aug 2019 00:29:37 +0200
with message-id <20190809222937.uz3dsx7pelr6wnz5@function>
and subject line Re: kernel-wedge: HDA sound board detection takes 60s in d-i
has caused the Debian Bug report #931507,
regarding kernel-wedge: HDA sound board detection takes 60s in d-i
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
931507: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931507
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: kernel-wedge
Version: 2.99
Severity: serious
Tags: a11y
Justification: prevents blind people from using d-i

We have had (late, unfortunately) reports that HDA-based audio hardware
does not get detected. Actually it does, but only after 60s of delay,
which is way too long for the espeakup script.

What happens is in snd_hdac_i915_init, which tries to load the i915
module, which is not included in d-i, and waits for 60s to get it loaded
and bound to it. The delay was "only" 10s in 4.19.12, but apparently
increased to 60s in 4.19.37.

So I guess we should just ship the i915 module in d-i, either manually
in the existing sound-modules*-di package, or in a separate package and
make sound-modules*-di depend on it. It's a big 3M module, but it would
be shipped only in the gtk images anyway.

It'd definitely be so much useful to have this change uploaded in time
for 10.1.

Samuel

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.0
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'proposed-updates-debug'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'buildd-experimental'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.1.0 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages kernel-wedge depends on:
ii  debhelper  12.1.1
ii  make       4.2.1-1.2

kernel-wedge recommends no packages.

kernel-wedge suggests no packages.

-- 
Samuel
* c is away : cuisine; bouffe
<y> oh, moi je fais plutôt cuisine & bouffe en fait :)
<c> oui c'est vrai, certains font cuisine && bouffe (juste au cas où... ;-))
<y> ( cuisine && bouffe ) || restau
<N> voire ((cuisine && bouffe) || restau) & apéritif
 -+- #ens-mim -+-

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
close 931507 5.2.7-1
thanks

Hello,

The patch was included in the 5.2.7 stable release.

Is a 4.19 kernel.org update planned to be uploaded before 10.1? If not,
could we include the patch in the package in time for 10.1?

Samuel

--- End Message ---
Reply to: