[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules



Control: severity -1 wishlist

On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 17:21 -0400, thomasw@fastmail.cn wrote:
> package: src:linux
> I think less running code when possible and a smaller linux image is
> always a good thing, therefore, I propose these as modules instead of
> built-in.
> 
> CONFIG_PINCTRL_AMD
> CONFIG_PINCTRL_CHERRYVIEW
> CONFIG_PINCTRL_INTEL
> CONFIG_PINCTRL_CANNONLAKE
> CONFIG_PINCTRL_CEDARFORK
> CONFIG_PINCTRL_DENVERTON
> CONFIG_PINCTRL_ICELAKE
> CONFIG_PINCTRL_LEWISBURG
> CONFIG_PINCTRL_SUNRISEPOINT

Ideally, yes; however pinctrl drivers may be needed very early during
boot so I don't know if these will work properly as modules.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
The program is absolutely right; therefore, the computer must be wrong.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: