[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#931507: hda: Fix 1-minute detection delay when i915 module is not available



On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 17:05:30 +0200,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> 
> Distribution installation images such as Debian include different sets
> of modules which can be downloaded dynamically.  Such images may notably
> include the hda sound modules but not the i915 DRM module, even if the
> latter was enabled at build time, as reported on
> https://bugs.debian.org/931507
> 
> In such a case hdac_i915 would be linked in and try to load the i915
> module, fail since it is not there, but still wait for a whole minute
> before giving up binding with it.
> 
> This fixes such as case by only waiting for the binding if the module
> was properly loaded (or module support is disabled, in which case i915
> is already compiled-in anyway).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
> ---
>  sound/hda/hdac_i915.c |   12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/sound/hda/hdac_i915.c
> +++ b/sound/hda/hdac_i915.c
> @@ -143,10 +143,14 @@ int snd_hdac_i915_init(struct hdac_bus *
>  	if (!acomp)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	if (!acomp->ops) {
> -		request_module("i915");
> -		/* 60s timeout */
> -		wait_for_completion_timeout(&bind_complete,
> -					    msecs_to_jiffies(60 * 1000));
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> +		if (request_module("i915") == 0)
> +#endif

Better to use IS_ENABLED(), so that we can avoid ugly ifdef.

		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) ||
		    !request_module("i915")) {
			....

thanks,

Takashi


Reply to: