On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 18:03 +1300, Richard Hector wrote: > Sorry if I missed previous discussion on this. > > I seem to only see linux-image-4.19.0-0.bpo.1-amd64-unsigned (and the > virtual package) for this version? Is that deliberate? No. The signed packages are built from separate source packages that need to be separately approved for inclusion in the archive. That just happened in the last few hours. > (There are cloud, rt and dbg packages as well) > > This seems to also result in the kernel being tainted (8192 - An > unsigned module has been loaded in a kernel supporting module > signature); or is that unrelated? This is expected if you install the unsigned packages (or an out-of- tree module). Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Unix is many things to many people, but it's never been everything to anybody.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part