Re: libbpf distro packaging
- To: Julia Kartseva <hex@fb.com>
- Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>, "labbott@redhat.com" <labbott@redhat.com>, "acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>, "debian-kernel@lists.debian.org" <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, "jolsa@kernel.org" <jolsa@kernel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, "md@linux.it" <md@linux.it>
- Subject: Re: libbpf distro packaging
- From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:01:45 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20191016100145.GA15580@krava>
- In-reply-to: <AAB8D5C3-807A-4EE3-B57C-C7D53F7E057D@fb.com>
- References: <20190821210906.GA31031@krava> <20190823092253.GA20775@krava> <a00bab9b-dae8-23d8-8de0-3751a1d1b023@fb.com> <20190826064235.GA17554@krava> <A2E805DD-8237-4703-BE6F-CC96A4D4D909@fb.com> <20190828071237.GA31023@krava> <20190930111305.GE602@krava> <040A8497-C388-4B65-9562-6DB95D72BE0F@fb.com> <[🔎] 20191008073958.GA10009@krava> <AAB8D5C3-807A-4EE3-B57C-C7D53F7E057D@fb.com>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:14:19PM +0000, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> systemd folks published libbpf CentOS 7 package in systemd corp repo: [1],
> so guess that proves that deps from other repo are fine.
yea, actualy got request for that:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762219
jirka
>
> Rebuild is fairly simple: [2]
>
> [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mrc0mmand/systemd-centos-ci/build/1053694/
> [2] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/13744#issuecomment-541168076
>
> On 10/8/19, 12:40 AM, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:25:51AM +0000, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> > >
> > > I wonder what are the steps to make libbpf available for CentOS {7|8} as well?
> > > One (likely the quickest) way to do that is to publish it to Fedora's EPEL [1].
> > >
> > > I have a little concern about dependencies, namely elfutils-libelf-devel and
> > > elfutils-devel are sourced directly by CentOS repos, e.g. [2], not sure if
> > > dependencies from another repo are fine.
> > >
> > > Thoughts? Thanks!
> >
> > I think that should be ok, I'll ask around and let you know
> >
> > jirka
>
Reply to: