[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#941720: linux-headers-4.19.0-0.bpo.6-amd64 depends on linux-headers-4.19.0-0.bpo.6-common=4.19.67-2+deb10u1~bpo9+1 but only linux-headers-4.19.0-0.bpo.6-amd64=4.19.67-2~bpo9+1 is available.



Package: linux-headers-4.19.0-0.bpo.6-amd64
Version: 4.19.67-2~bpo9+1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

I tried to install the linux-headers-4.19.0-0.bpo.6-amd64 package via
stretch-backports but I was met with a unmet dependency.

$ sudo apt install linux-headers-4.19.0-0.bpo.6-amd64
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 linux-headers-4.19.0-0.bpo.6-amd64 : Depends:
 linux-headers-4.19.0-0.bpo.6-common (= 4.19.67-2+deb10u1~bpo9+1) but
 4.19.67-2~bpo9+1 is to be installed
 E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.11
  APT prefers oldstable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-0.bpo.6-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages linux-headers-4.19.0-0.bpo.6-amd64 depends on:
ii  linux-compiler-gcc-6-x86             4.19.67-2+deb10u1~bpo9+1
ii  linux-headers-4.19.0-0.bpo.6-common  4.19.67-2~bpo9+1
ii  linux-kbuild-4.19                    4.19.67-2+deb10u1~bpo9+1

linux-headers-4.19.0-0.bpo.6-amd64 recommends no packages.

linux-headers-4.19.0-0.bpo.6-amd64 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


Reply to: