[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#714694: marked as done (linux-image-amd64: Could not start debian)



Your message dated Wed, 8 May 2019 19:59:19 +0200
with message-id <20190508175919.GD7741@pisco.westfalen.local>
and subject line Re: Bug#714694: Acknowledgement (linux-image-amd64: Could not start debian)
has caused the Debian Bug report #714694,
regarding linux-image-amd64: Could not start debian
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
714694: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714694
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-amd64
Version: 3.9+49
Severity: important

Hello,

Since I upgrade the kernel, I could not start my system anymore. initramfs is
launched, but fail in loading my filesystem. I have no other choice than
restart the system with the previous kernel.

Here is a copy of initramfs config :

$ cat /etc/initramfs-tools/modules
# …
dm-mod
drm
radeon modeset=1

Thank you for your help !


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (90,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)

Attachment: 20130701_003.jpg
Description: JPEG image


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 11:37:23AM +0200, Sébastien Dailly wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I could not reproduce the problem on other computers, and the 'rootdelay=N' solution works for me.
> 
> You can feel free to close the bug.

Closing.

Cheers,
        Moritz

--- End Message ---

Reply to: