Re: firmware-nonfree update
On 25/03/2019 18:20, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 22:00 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 14:05 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> [...]
>>> (It
>>> may be unlikely for old suites to have users with new hardware, however it's
>>> possible and users that don't have it will be unaffected by the new firmware, so
>>> it wouldn't hurt to ship it.)
>>>
>>> My branch is for jessie but I can prepare it for stretch too if you think that's
>>> worth it.
>>
>> The current jessie-security version of firmware-nonfree is really a
>> backport from stretch. So I would prefer it if you update the stretch
>> branch first and then merge that to jessie-security.
>
> I've merged your changes to stretch, uploaded to stretch, and then
> merged stretch to jessie-security. Let me know if you want to do the
> upload to jessie-security or if I should do it.
I don't mind either way. We should use -4~deb8u2 rather than -5~deb8u1 so that
we don't (temporarily) have a higher version in jessie than stretch until the
point release.
Emilio
Reply to: