Bug#785065: #785065: is this still relevant ?

To: 785065@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#785065: #785065: is this still relevant ?
From: Frédéric Bonnard <frediz@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:51:49 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20190320155149.GD26059@kin.test.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com>
Reply-to: Frédéric Bonnard <frediz@debian.org>, 785065@bugs.debian.org
References: <20150512002407.9932.23042.reportbug@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>

Hi Ben,

I was told that there is no 32b bootstrap code involved, only BE.
I understand this problem does not happen on current kernels.
May we close this bug? or for more details we can ping Michael.
Regards,

F.

Attachment: pgpg5fpgRvDfn.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Attachment: pgpta15w9kkzR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#785065: #785065: is this still relevant ?
  - From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#908924: MICROSOFT ACCOUNT FINAL 2019 UPDATE IN PROGRESS!
Next by Date: Processing of linux-signed-amd64_5.0.2+1~exp1_source.changes
Previous by thread: Bug#908924: MICROSOFT ACCOUNT FINAL 2019 UPDATE IN PROGRESS!
Next by thread: Bug#785065: #785065: is this still relevant ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread