[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#923400: initramfs-tools: failure inside chroot: W: Couldn't identify type of root file system for fsck hook



Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: retitle -1 Add option to override filesystem type detection

On Wed, 2019-02-27 at 18:38 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2019-02-27 17:45:33)
> > Building a system image using multistrap,
> > including generating an initial ramdisk,
> > worked fine recently.
> >
> > Now it fails with this error message:
> > 
> >   W: Couldn't identify type of root file system for fsck hook
> > 
> > It seems to me that git commit a8ed874 intended to extend the code
> > operating on "auto" mounted filesystems to cover all _except_ root disk,
> > but that the logic is flipped around so that now it _only_ extends that
> > to include root disk:

This commit went into version 0.123, before stretch, so if your use
case "worked fine recently" then this is not the change that broke it.

> Please ignore my guess above: I think I understand now that it was 
> intentional to check root disk (I got confused by the comment talking 
> about ignoring root and then processing root not skipping it).
> 
> Let me clarify my use case: I generate a system image on a fast amd64 
> system targeted a slower real device (that's the reason having initramfs 
> generated is important).
> 
> fstab now unconditionally being distrusted for root disk makes it more 
> difficult to build on a different host than intended for target boot.
>
> Would it perhaps make sense to support passing pre-resolved root 
> filesystem fstype as an environment variable, taking precedence over 
> probing?

I don't think this should be an environment variable but it does seem
like a useful option.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
The obvious mathematical breakthrough [to break modern encryption]
would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers.
                                                           - Bill Gates


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: