Le 2018-12-17 09:19, Greg KH a écrit :
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 09:08:20PM +0100, Loic wrote:
> > Le 2018-12-16 20:27, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
> > > On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 09:52:33 +0100
> > > Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 06:25:37PM +0100, Loic wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > Please picked up this patch for linux 4.4 and 4.9.
> > > > > This fixes CVE-2017-0605 (Rejected?). Tested in Debian ;)
> > > >
> > > > It was rejected as a CVE for a good reason, and that reason is also
> > > > why
> > > > I refused to add it to the stable kernel releases. In short, this is
> > > > not an issue or bug at all, there is nothing wrong with the existing
> > > > code.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'm starting to regret that I ever accepted the original patch :-(
> > >
> > > -- Steve
> >
> > Okay, I hadn't looked at the previous conversations because this
> > change is
> > in the upstream and in debian...
>
> Upstream is fine, it's a valid change so that people don't keep sending
> the crazy patch over and over.
>
> Debian is just cargo-culting the thing and should probably drop it as it
> keeps coming back to me every 3 months or so, and I have to reject it
> again :(
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Why didn't you follow the upstream or add a comment "no change for
fake
CVE-2017-0605" to break the debian patch ?