[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#895384: marked as done (nfs-utils: debian/watch pattern matches ../)



Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2018 12:40:00 +0100
with message-id <54b5e401-e313-6557-d489-199b378700aa@debian.org>
and subject line Re: fixed in git?
has caused the Debian Bug report #895384,
regarding nfs-utils: debian/watch pattern matches ../
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
895384: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895384
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: nfs-utils
Version: 1:1.3.4-2.1
Tags: patch

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/nfs-utils mentions "Problems while searching
for a new upstream version". The reason turns out to be that the version
string pattern in debian/watch matches .. as well as 2.3.1 etc. and uscan
treats .. as newest. A minimal fix (tested) is to change /([\.\d]+)/ to
/(\d[\.\d]*)/ . There may be better solutions.

Incidentally, the latest upstream release of nfs-utils is 2.3.1. Debian sid
still has 1.3.4.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.3.4-2.3

Le 15/12/18 à 02:17, Vincent McIntyre a écrit :
This seems to have been addressed by Laurent recently (thanks!)

https://salsa.debian.org/debian/nfs-utils/commit/cd79aec324fe58a240b29d53445de33147eb166b

Laurent, perhaps the changelog line could have
  (Closes: #895384)
appended? I'm not sure what the protocol is here.

The bug here can indeed be closed.

I updated the changelog to add the closes statement for documentation.

Thanks for noticing this

Kind regards,

Laurent Bigonville

--- End Message ---

Reply to: