Some minor clarifications: On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 22:28 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] > Any symbol exported from an assembly-language file won't automatically > get a symbol version, since there's no type information there. The way > to fix this is to include (or directly) add the function prototypes in "... include (or directly add) ..." > arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h. > > I don't think that return_to_handler should be exported at all. No > other architecture does. "No other architecture exports it." [...] > I'm removing the patch tag as this patch isn't usable. Please add it > again when you send another patch. Also, you are welcome to send a > merge request on Gitlab instead of a patch; I find easier to discuss > changes that way. By "Gitlab" I mean salsa.debian.org. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part