Hello Frank and Pradeep, I was hoping that you would have some insight on a possible bug/regression/incompability between nfs-ganesha and the Linux kernel with a specific patch to which you reacted (see below) in https://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=150998968529002&w=2. There is no mail about the results of Pradeep's checking whether that patch is safe for nfs-ganesha on the server side, or whether there were additional changes needed. Maybe one of you could shed some light on that. I've created a tracking Debian bug report for our issue: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898165 Best regards, Moritz On 14.05.2018 11:05, Moritz Schlarb wrote: > Control: tags -1 + patch upstream > Control: notfound -1 linux/3.16.51-3+deb8u1 > > Hi everyone, > > I have identified the upstream commit that introduced this > bug/regression for us. > > It is c05cefcc72416a37eba5a2b35f0704ed758a9145 "nfs: Fix ugly referral > attributes" > (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c05cefcc72416a37eba5a2b35f0704ed758a9145) > which seems to have been part of upstream 3.16.54. > > I have manually compiled 3.16.56-1+deb8u1 with that patch reversed and I > can successfully mount my home directory again. > > Regards, > -- Moritz Schlarb Unix-Gruppe | Systembetreuung Zentrum für Datenverarbeitung Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Raum 01-331 - Tel. +49 6131 39-29441 OpenPGP Fingerprint: DF01 2247 BFC6 5501 AFF2 8445 0C24 B841 C7DD BAAF
begin:vcard fn:Moritz Schlarb n:Schlarb;Moritz org;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:Johannes Gutenberg-Universit=C3=A4t Mainz;Zentrum f=C3=BCr Datenverarbeitung adr;dom:;;;Mainz email;internet:schlarbm@uni-mainz.de tel;work:+49 6131 39 29441 note;quoted-printable:OpenPGP Fingerprint: DF01 2247 BFC6=0D=0A= 5501 AFF2 8445 0C24 B841 C7DD BAAF version:2.1 end:vcard
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature