Re: armel/marvell kernel size
Dear Ben,
Thanks for keeping armel things rolling for a few releases!
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 15:07 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> Sadly, linux has again failed to build on armel in experimental due to
>> the image size growing too large.
>
> It's happened again. The compressed image is 1% over the limit.
Yes, it's time again.
I tried the "CRYPTO_MANAGER2" stuff you mentioned before.
Unfortunately, I didn't make it built as module, except after
disabling CONFIG_NET, which seems quite ridiculous.
Do you know any other option, BTW?
I'll continue trying for a while.
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
Reply to: