On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 04:16:50PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Basically, the only thing that I want to see is a specific config for > that kernel, nothing else. Otherwise, it's going to be too much > maintenance work. Indeed, it should *not* be a different source upload, > that's too much work as well. There also may be some optimization that > we could do. > > Also, I don't see this happening without a prior agreement from the > kernel team (which means probably that Ben has to agree). On our side, > we could prepare a list of kernel modules that we do *not* want. You might consider looking at what Ubuntu did to their kernel. https://insights.ubuntu.com/2017/04/05/ubuntu-on-aws-gets-serious-performance-boost-with-aws-tuned-kernel/ suggests that they did more than just disable some modules, but it's light on details. If we're able to come up with a specific list of proposed changes, we'll probably be able to have a more fruitful conversation. noah
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature