On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 17:13 +0100, Dave Love wrote: > I guess I wrote that badly. > > busybox isn't actually required by cryptsetup, just recommended, but it > should be required by something. The example shows it's possible to > make packages uninstallable, if they pull the initramfs trigger, by > removing busybox, which you can do cleanly as far as apt is concerned: If cryptsetup's initramfs support was moved to a separate package, that would depend on busybox. See bug #783297. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings It is easier to write an incorrect program than to understand a correct one.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part