Your message dated Sun, 04 Jun 2017 12:17:47 +0100 with message-id <1496575067.3992.64.camel@decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: debian-kernel-handbook: Possible typo in example on Chapter 6 has caused the Debian Bug report #711450, regarding debian-kernel-handbook: Possible typo in example on Chapter 6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 711450: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711450 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: debian-kernel-handbook: Possible typo in example on Chapter 6
- From: Luís Picciochi Oliveira <Pitxyoki@Gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:29:06 +0100
- Message-id: <20130606222906.14485.78886.reportbug@localhost.localdomain>
Package: debian-kernel-handbook Version: 1.0.15 Severity: normal Hi, On Chapter 6 of the Kernel Handbook[1], there's an example for a possible content of /etc/modules: loop max_int=32 sbp2 I understand that "max_int" is supposed to be a parameter to the loop module, as explained in this Chapter. However, the modinfo command output shown afterwards doesn't display this as a possible parameter, only "max_loop" and "max_part". I believe the example content of /etc/modules should be updated to reflect the possible parameters displayed afterwards. Best regards, Luís Picciochi 1 - http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-modules.html -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 711450-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: debian-kernel-handbook: Possible typo in example on Chapter 6
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 12:17:47 +0100
- Message-id: <1496575067.3992.64.camel@decadent.org.uk>
- In-reply-to: <20130606222906.14485.78886.reportbug@localhost.localdomain>
- References: <20130606222906.14485.78886.reportbug@localhost.localdomain>
Version: 1.0.17 On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:29:06 +0100 Luís Picciochi Oliveira <Pitxyoki@Gmail.com> wrote: > Package: debian-kernel-handbook > Version: 1.0.15 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > On Chapter 6 of the Kernel Handbook[1], there's an example for a possible > content of /etc/modules: > loop max_int=32 > sbp2 > > I understand that "max_int" is supposed to be a parameter to the loop module, > as explained in this Chapter. However, the modinfo command output shown > afterwards doesn't display this as a possible parameter, only "max_loop" and > "max_part". > > I believe the example content of /etc/modules should be updated to reflect the > possible parameters displayed afterwards. I actually deleted the parameter from the example because systemd doesn't support parameters here. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings It is easier to write an incorrect program than to understand a correct one.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---