Am 31.03.2017 um 19:17 schrieb Ben Hutchings: > On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 18:52 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > [..] >> I don't think it makes any sense. Why should we symlink some thing >> different/not_stable to file name of stable firmware? >> Especially if we have 1.dev.0? >> firmware-ath9k-htc package should and can provide any latest possible >> version of firmware form git. All possible distribution patches are >> welcome as well. >> firmware-ath9k-htc-v1.5 should provide stable version without any >> chanes. This is needed to make sure suers are able to fall back to >> working version of firmware even if firmware-ath9k-htc will brake >> connection. > > If this package is not going to provide a stable ABI then I'll consider > adding a Breaks instead. I'm not sure what you mean. -- Regards, Oleksij
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature