[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#858125: e1000: ethernet interface hangs occasionally, kernel reports hang



Here is the dmesg output from just this afternoon:

	[Mar18 12:40] e1000e 0000:03:00.0 eth0: Reset adapter unexpectedly
	[  +3.891401] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
	[Mar18 13:40] e1000e 0000:03:00.0 eth0: Reset adapter unexpectedly
	[  +3.827380] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
	[Mar18 14:43] e1000e 0000:03:00.0 eth0: Reset adapter unexpectedly
	[  +3.871385] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
	[Mar18 14:47] e1000e 0000:03:00.0 eth0: Reset adapter unexpectedly
	[  +3.431026] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
	[Mar18 16:13] e1000e 0000:03:00.0 eth0: Reset adapter unexpectedly
	[  +3.799385] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
	[Mar18 17:04] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
	[  +9.870235] e1000e: eth1 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
	[Mar18 17:05] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
	[Mar18 17:09] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx

which is pretty extreme.  Eight resets in five hours!  This is a home
server (momjian.us) so it isn't like it is pushing huge amounts of data
or overloaded.

I did so much research on this before reporting it because this is
common hardware (SuperMicro) and Intel PRO/1000 ethernet adaptors, which
are also popular.   There must be something odd about my server, but I
have no idea what it is.  Also, if I buy a dual PCI-E adaptor, it will
also be an Intel PRO/1000.  Will I get the same errors on that?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +


Reply to: