[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#857686: marked as done (linux-image-marvell for jessie-backports release 4.9+79~bpo8+1 not properly released)



Your message dated Mon, 13 Mar 2017 23:25:47 +0000
with message-id <1489447547.2852.9.camel@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#857686: linux-image-marvell for jessie-backports release 4.9+79~bpo8+1 not properly released
has caused the Debian Bug report #857686,
regarding linux-image-marvell for jessie-backports release 4.9+79~bpo8+1 not properly released
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
857686: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857686
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-marvell
Version: 4.9+78~bpo8+1

The package linux-image-marvell for jessie-backports is in a broken state, as can be seen on the debian package website:

https://packages.debian.org/jessie-backports/linux-image-marvell

it shows version "4.9+78~bpo8+1" and a dependency on "linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.1-marvell" which is shown as "Package not available".

The links on the right side to the Changelog and the Download all refer to version "79~bpo8+1". That version has the correct dependency (ABI was bumped to bpo.2), but somehow it is not properly released.

apt on the target machine also only finds the old version "4.9+78~bpo8+1".

So it looks like the new version "79~bpo8+1" did not make it into the release database correctly. As a result, the Linux kernel dependencies on the target machine are also in a weird state, as the bpo.2 releases show up as currently not installed instead of as updates to the bpo.1 release.

Best Regards,
Robert Schlabbach

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.9+79~bpo8+2

This is not a bug in the package; the new version just hasn't been
built for armel yet:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=linux-latest&suite=jessie-backports

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
If at first you don't succeed, you're doing about average.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---

Reply to: