-------- Forwarded Message -------- Message-id: <CAJntQE9a9mTpwBo27u=ZpvcM+q4Tfsjs=2y6EuiZSkH0j55Evw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:42:20 +0530 Subject: Re: Bug#854677: linux-image-amd64 - patches from kernel source required To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> From: Narayanan R S <nars@kadamba.org> Hello Ben, I did have the documented ICMP network issues when I used the 4.9 version of the backported kernel. When I reverted back to the 4.8 version (of the backported kernel), everything was back to normal. I am not sure when in the 4.9 series this was fixed but the bug report explicitly documents 4.9.5. I am not sure what version the backported kernel + patches corresponds to in the official/mainstream 4.9 kernel. Hope this helps. Thanks. Regards, Narayanan. On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 17:55 +0530, Narayanan R S wrote: > > Package: linux-image-amd64 > > Version: 4.9+78 > > > > The current (backported) version of linux-image-amd64 (for Jessie) > > appears > > to need a few important fixes from the kernel source (upstream). > > > > Please see: > > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2406212.html > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402695 > > > > It appears that this has been fixed in the 4.9 series after 4.9.5 (per > > the > > bugzilla link above) - so can the package be suitably updated to > > incorporate this fix? > > Why do you think that 4.9 is affected? Have you reproduced the bug? > The Red Hat bug report seems to say that only 4.8.x was affected. > > Ben. > > -- > Ben Hutchings > Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature. > >
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 17:55 +0530, Narayanan R S wrote:
> Package: linux-image-amd64
> Version: 4.9+78
>
> The current (backported) version of linux-image-amd64 (for Jessie) appears
> to need a few important fixes from the kernel source (upstream).
>
> Please see:
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2406212.html
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402695
>
> It appears that this has been fixed in the 4.9 series after 4.9.5 (per the
> bugzilla link above) - so can the package be suitably updated to
> incorporate this fix?
Why do you think that 4.9 is affected? Have you reproduced the bug?
The Red Hat bug report seems to say that only 4.8.x was affected.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.